hello
From time to time (about once a week for one day) the exit scanner of
arthur edelstein[1] shows my windows exit[2] with a failure rate.
I usually only see this happening when the "Average probability weighted failure rate" is high too so i wonder if his measuring is reliable or if it is not a problem on my side.
If the failure rate is correct is there a way for me to find out why or when the failures are happening?
Georg, you wrote that you are currently doing these tests too. Could you tell me the results of my relay?
Thanks
[1] https://arthuredelstein.net/exits/ [2] DC81AA3B1D51566DBF27BFA562E4047AEB1C52DA
Michael Gerstacker:
hello
From time to time (about once a week for one day) the exit scanner of
arthur edelstein[1] shows my windows exit[2] with a failure rate.
I usually only see this happening when the "Average probability weighted failure rate" is high too so i wonder if his measuring is reliable or if it is not a problem on my side.
If the failure rate is correct is there a way for me to find out why or when the failures are happening?
Georg, you wrote that you are currently doing these tests too. Could you tell me the results of my relay?
Here is what I have:
20200217 10/10 success 20200218 9/10 success 1/10 Circuit error: Circuit failed: TIMEOUT 20200219 10/10 success 20200220 10/10 success 20200222 10/10 success 20200224 9/10 success 1/10 Circuit error: 552 No descriptor for DC81AA3B1D51566DBF27BFA562E4047AEB1C52DA 20200226 10/10 success 20200227 10/10 success 20200228 10/10 success 20200302 10/10 success 20200303 10/10 success 20200304 10/10 success 20200305 10/10 success 20200306 10/10 success 20200308 10/10 success 20200309 10/10 success 20200310 10/10 success 20200312 10/10 success 20200313 9/10 success 1/10 Circuit error: Circuit failed: TIMEOUT 20200315 10/10 success 20200316 10/10 success 20200317 10/10 success
It looks pretty good to me, to be honest. I compared that to what Arthur has and the results are comparable. I then looked at data Arthur has but where I did not measure (for whatever reason) but that looks good, too.
So, I am not sure about which failure rate for your relay you are talking about. If it's the 1/10 items above (or something similar) I think that's okay. At least I don't think there is something seriously wrong with your exit relay based on that.
Georg
Thanks
[1] https://arthuredelstein.net/exits/ [2] DC81AA3B1D51566DBF27BFA562E4047AEB1C52DA
network-health mailing list network-health@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/network-health
Am Di., 17. März 2020 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Georg Koppen gk@torproject.org:
It looks pretty good to me, to be honest. I compared that to what Arthur has and the results are comparable. I then looked at data Arthur has but where I did not measure (for whatever reason) but that looks good, too.
So, I am not sure about which failure rate for your relay you are talking about. If it's the 1/10 items above (or something similar) I think that's okay. At least I don't think there is something seriously wrong with your exit relay based on that.
Yes that was what i was talking about.
Because it is running on Windows and Windows relays are rare so i am a bit alarmed when i see it behaving different to other relays.
Sometimes it is shown with 10% or even 20% failure rate while other relays in arthurs list are still shown with zero failure rate so i was not sure if this is "normal" or if there is something to tweak for me.
Thank you for clarifying!
Have a nice day all
network-health@lists.torproject.org