Correction: strict *subset*
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 at 19:59 Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr> wrote:
oh this is interesting, and news to me. i suspect there is much here i need to learn.

however, if we reframe OONI's mission as "we're interested in certain kinds of network outages", then OONI's goals become a strict superset of Atlas's goals.

it seems we could at least get them on board for putting Atlas probes/anchors next to major Tor relays. then if anything goes amiss not only do we register it as a "censorship event", RIPE registers it as a "network/connectivity degradation". And that latter point can only help OONI.


-V

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 19:20 <balooni@espiv.net> wrote:
Hi,

i@virgil.gr wrote:

> http://atlas.ripe.net/
>
> The idea of putting their probes (or even anchors) next to Tor relays
> and/or OONI probes seems an immensely good idea because doing this
> will yoke the interests of generic network infrastructure people with
> those of Tor and OONI.
>
> I'd be happy to bring them to the Tor meeting in Berlin, but they
> seem a better fit for the OONI meeting in Italy.  So I'm inclined to
> have you invite them.  Their community contacts are:
> becha@ripe.net
> mcb@ripe.net

IIRC Ripe atlas would not like to be associated with
neither Tor nor OONI. At some point they have explicitly mentioned
that they would not like to be involved in any "conflict of interests"
by their parent organization Ripe.

I will be more than happy to find out that this is not the case anymore?
_______________________________________________
ooni-dev mailing list
ooni-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ooni-dev