On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Ian Goldberg iang@cs.uwaterloo.ca wrote: [...]
* I'm hoping to write this up as a proposed spec soon, unless Ian or somebody wants to give it a shot.
Please go ahead.
Here's a draft sketch that I've put into proposals/ideas in the the torspec repository. Please let me know what I've gotten wrong, what is over/under-engineered, and so on.
Filename: xxx-ntor-handshake.txt Title: Improved circuit-creation key exchange Author: Nick Mathewson Created: 11-May-2011 Status: Draft
This is an attempt to translate the proposed circuit handshake from "Anonymity and one-way authentication in key-exchange protocols" by Goldberg, Stebila, and Ustaoglu, into a Tor proposal format.
It assumes something like Robert Ransom's proposal draft is in place to provide an extended CREATE cell format that can indicate what type of handshake is in use.
Notation:
Let a|b be the concatenation of a with b.
Let H(x,t) be a tweakable hash function of output width H_LENGTH bytes.
Let t_keyid, t_mac, t_key, and t_verify be a set of arbitrarily-chosen tweaks for the hash function.
Let EXP(a,b) be a^b in some appropriate group G where the appropriate DH parameters hold. Let's say elements of this group, when represented as byte strings, are all G_LENGTH bytes long. Let's say we are using a generator g for this group.
Let PROTOID be a string designating this variant of the protocol.
Let KEYID be a collision-resistant (but not necessarily preimage-resistant) hash function on members of G, of output length H_LENGTH bytes.
Instantiation:
Let's call this PROTOID "ntor-curve25519-sha256-1"
Set H(x,t) == HMAC_SHA256 with message x and key t. So H_LENGTH == 32. Set t_mac == PROTOID | ":mac" t_key1 == PROTOID | ":key1" t_key2 == PROTOID | ":verify" Set EXP(a,b) == curve25519(a,b), and g == 9 .
Set KEYID(B) == B. (We don't need to use a hash function here, since our keys are already very short. It is trivially collision-resistant, since KEYID(A)====KEYID(B) iff A==B.)
Protocol:
Take a router with identity key digest ID.
As setup, the router generates a secret key b, and a public onion key B = EXP(g,b). The router publishes B in its server descriptor.
To send a create cell, the client generates a keypair of x, X=EXP(g,y) and sends a CREATE cell with contents:
NODEID: ID -- H_LENGTH bytes KEYID: KEYID(B) -- H_LENGTH bytes CLIENT_PK: X -- G_LENGTH bytes
The server checks X, generates a keypair of y, Y=EXP(g,y) and computes
secret_input = EXP(X,y) | EXP(X,b) | ID | B | X | Y | PROTOID KEY_SEED = H(secret_input, t_key) verify = H(secret_input, t_verify) auth_input = verify | ID | B | Y | X | PROTOID | "Server"
The server sends a CREATED cell containing:
SERVER_PK: Y -- G_LENGTH bytes AUTH: H(auth_input, t_mac) -- H_LENGTH byets
The client then checks Y, and computes
secret_input = EXP(Y,x) | EXP(B,x) | ID | B | X | Y | PROTOID KEY_SEED = H(secret_input, t_key1) verify = H(secret_input, t_verify) auth_input = verify | ID | B | Y | X | PROTOID | "Server"
The client verifies that AUTH == H(auth_input, t_mac).
Both parties now have a shared value for KEY_SEED. They expand this into the keys needed for the Tor relay protocol.
Key expansion:
Currently, the key expansion formula used by Tor here is
K = SHA(K0 | [00]) | SHA(K0 | [01]) | SHH(K0 | [02]) | ...
where K0==g^xy, and K is divvied up into Df, Db, Kf, and Kb portions.
Instead, let's have it be
K = H(KEY_SEED, t_expand1) | H(KEY_SEED, t_expand2) | ...
where t_expand1..N are tweaks for the hash.
Performance notes:
In Tor's current circuit creation handshake, the client does: One RSA public-key encryption A full DH handshake in Z_p A short AES encryption Five SHA1s for key expansion And the server does: One RSA private-key decryption A full DH handshake in Z_p A short AES decryption Five SHA1s for key expansion
While in the revised handshake, the client does: A full DH handshake A public-half of a DH handshake 3 H operations for the handshake 3 H operations for the key expansion and the server does: A full DH handshake A private-half of a DH handshake 3 H operations for the handshake 3 H operations for the key expansion