Nick Mathewson nickm@alum.mit.edu wrote Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:31:48 -0400:
| Everything that describes how these documents are formatted describes | them as containing multiple "a" lines. Thus, anybody parsing a | consensus or microdescriptor MUST accept multiple "a" lines, even if | they ignore all but the first. | | But everything that describes how these documents are *generated* | describes them as containing a single "a" line. Thus, there doesn't | need a way to come up with a consensus containing multiple a lines. | | In other words, I think that for now, one "a" line is fine. But we | need to make sure that anything reading these documents can handle | more than one, in case we generate them differently later. | | Does that make sense?
Indeed. Thanks.