On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:28 AM, George Kadianakis desnacked@riseup.net wrote: [...]
I'm not sure what we should do. I think we should figure out how much stuff we want to change at this time:
Should we change nothing, stay still and wait for the "next gen hs" paper that might never arrive?
Should we change a few things we care about (keysize, #9001 etc.) and leave the rest for the "next gen hs" paper?
Or maybe we should start incrementally fixing everything we can and think again when we read the "next gen hs" paper?
Or maybe something else?
My thought is that we should write the best hidden services designs and specifications that we currently can figure out how to write, figure out what we _don't_ know how to write in it, and then decide whether that merits delay or not.
We should also try to guess how compatible/incompatible what we don't know how to do will be with what we *do* know how to do, and have that influence or decisions too.
There could be a fine "next gen hs" design paper in the works, or there might not, but IMO indefinite delay is a bad idea.
yrs,