Yep, I've run Mike Perry's code before. It's all in torflow. I was also on a 1 gbits link, but as I recall it wasn't that saturated so you might be able to get away with a 500 mbits.
I last ran his scripts back in July, and the logs and other saved data consumed all remaining disk space. I don't know if I missed a cleanup step somewhere or if the issue was fixed since then, but it's something to be aware of.
-- Jesse V.
On 11/03/2015 07:29 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
A 10GB network connection is not a requirement, 1GB would be fine, 500MB would also be fine. Mine is 4 core, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5606 @ 2.13GHz w/ 8GB of RAM.
Everything is in torflow, I'm not aware of any other code.
-tom
On 2 November 2015 at 17:26, starlight.2015q3@binnacle.cx wrote:
I am considering starting up a passive BWauth in order to understand how they work and fix bugs.
What is the minimum and ideal hardware configuration for a BWauth?
Have my eye on an OVH config with unmetered 1G, a fuzzy promise of 500mbps minimum bandwidth and a 3.4GHz 4core/8thread AES-NI CPU: http://ark.intel.com/products/80910
The server could be turned up in any of their facilities: https://www.ovh.com/us/about-us/datacenters.xml
Or is 10G a requirement? (out of my league)
Is all code here
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torflow.git/tree/NetworkScanners/BwAuthority
or is there more? Are uncommitted fixes lying around anywhere?
Thanks
tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev