-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Well, this is probably difficult to argue about. Personally, I like Globe's interface more. A matter of taste?
Yes, definitely.
But more importantly, I think Globe has the better code. That's probably a question for real web front-end developers though. (Not saying that this wouldn't apply to other people on this thread, but it certainly doesn't apply to me.)
So, maybe we should improve Globe's aesthetics to look more like Atlas' and then focus on Globe. For example, I hear that people complained about Globe using too much whitespace.
current situation
- - globe lost its maintainer - - atlas is maintained by phw - - globes code might be better according to Karsten - - globes graphs are more powerful (user can choose time span to a certain extent) - - a few people(?) prefer altas' UI over globes due to excessive whitespace in globe
Eventually the one actually doing the maintenance will be the one deciding which one will be focused on - I guess.
Atlas tickets: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=as...
Globe tickets: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=as...
whichever of the two we focus our efforts on now will soon become the better tool.
Looking forward to it!
btw: I just found out that globe also supports contact:<keyword> searches, maybe this should be documented somewhere? And because it has no <40 results restrictions it just became my favorite ;)