2016-10-13 22:48 GMT-03:00, teor teor2345@gmail.com:
On 14 Oct 2016, at 08:03, blacklight . pandakaasftw@gmail.com wrote:
I would love to help, but can you also volunteer when cannot give ALL the feedback?
On 14 Oct 2016, at 11:30, ng0 ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is wrote:
Do all these task have to apply to make the test valid/useful for you? On one of my test systems - I contribute to Guix - there is no chance of a (system-specific, unofficial) torbrowser build so far (but I/we keep looking into this). So long story short, I can run tests on some amd64_x86 based gnu-systems, but on one of them I need to exclude torbrowser.
We only do source releases for tor alphas and release candidates. (Except for Debian, which has experimental alphas built nightly.)
So you must build tor from source in order to run the tests.
All the other tests are optional, but the more you can do, the better!
If you can't build tor from source, you can still help by giving us feedback on the Tor Browser alpha series, or the Tor Expert Bundles on Windows.
T
-- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
quick and dirty feedback; 6 relays running well 0.3.0.0-alpha-dev (>=git-d1bcba19a9790a37) for quite a while (3 in dual stack). 4freebsd and 2netbsd machines. 5static binary, 1shared (freebsd 10.3-R-p7, i386).
every single relay that now is running -dev was running 0.2.9.4-alpha since its release date (or one/two days after it was available on your distfiles/archives ftp). I was following the releases available on the ftp, not ports/pkg/pkgsrc/pkgin/... *EXCEPT* for one machine that runs freebsd10.3r-p7 (i386); it was working good with 0.2.9.2-alpha only (again, with shared libs).
sorry for not providing proper feedback or patch on Tor's trac. I plan to do that ASAP.
PS: http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/tor-bsd/2016-October/000467.html might be interesting for those running Tor (security/tor-devel) with FreeBSD. ty.