On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:38:56PM -0500, David Goulet wrote:
Anyway, if you think this algorithm could be improved, please respond. If you think this algorithm is wrong, please respond. If you can reproduce the result on your own with this algo, omg please respond! :) The above could be totally wrong but hopefully we did a fairly good job. Please remember, this is an estimate. :)
I would be interested to see the capacity by pluggable transport: how much headroom each PT has and which ones need more bridges.
I tried it a few months ago but I didn't have the idea of looking at the read/write bytes history. I tried using measured/advertised bandwidth and using the speed of consensus downloads from the dirreq-v3-tunneled-dl line.
[tor-dev] Per-transport bridge bandwidth and bridge counts https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-July/009136.html Using measured bandwidth: https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-20/pt-bandwid... Using median dirreq-v3-tunneled-dl rate: https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-20/pt-dl.md.p... Source code: https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-20.tar.gz