On Jan 16, 2012 2:38 PM, "Ian Goldberg" <iang@cs.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:16:31PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg <iang@cs.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography
> > > jounral:
> > >
> > > http://www.springerlink.com/content/nl86n0u547873001/
> > >
> > > (The above cacr link has also been updated to the latest version.)
> >
> > Congratulations, Ian!  Any substantial changes since the CACR version?
>
> No, just minor ones, and I don't think any involving the protocol
> itself, but just the text.
>
> > Have you been getting any feedback from other vectors?  Any
> > interesting/useful comments from reviewers?
> >
> > Is it your sense that folks outside of PCs and this list are reviewing
> > your work here and giving it the kind of attention we'd want before
> > deploying it?  And if not, is there anything we can do to help this
> > design get more attention?
>
> As far as I know, only the journal reviewers and this list (and we
> authors, of course) have looked at it.  Not too surprising, of course,
> as Tor is probably the most obvious use case.
Most SSL connections involve only one authenticated side.
>
>   - Ian
> _______________________________________________
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev