It looks like Atlas is essentially a static application where everything runs client side.
Globe has a has a node.js backend. Is there any actually need for state to persist within the application?
Atlas looks like a cleaner system in many ways.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:40 AM, isis isis@torproject.org wrote:
Abhiram Chintangal transcribed 4.6K bytes:
Hello,
Sounds interesting. Is it any different from Atlas? It looks like both of them are similar in functionality.
They are roughly the same in features. Originally, only Globe allowed people to look up bridge relays, both by fingerprint, hashed, and double hashed fingerprint, but Atlas now has those features as well. IMO, Atlas is has better aesthetics, although perhaps it could use more interactivity on its charts. Essentially, they are the same.
Perhaps you have a good point? Should we be focusing efforts on either Atlas or Globe, rather than both?
-- ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft _________________________________________________________ OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35 Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt
tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev