On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 02:48:45AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
It's suggested and welcome that all overlay networks publicly review, audit, analyze, each others work and offerings. Unfortunately that hasn't develop much yet in a formal dedicated as responsibility manner among even the larger opensource community, or even discussion if that is a good idea. (But there is some good work in some projects out there lately of their own work... automated code linting, and the rarer procured third party audit.)
Then shall we presume all our networks are equivalently secure?, or equivalently flawed, as each network happens to advertise now and then.
Makes sense.
This may leave the matter of partitioning up to the user to consider pursuant to any note about that in the app documentation.
I agree. Giving power of choice to the users is ideal.
The app could enable simultaneous multihome based on commandline options... --tor --i2p --cjdns --other, default [whatever] . And of course all the ports / addresses / bindings would need to be flexible.
On equivalent networks, presence is maybe a bigger issue than partitioning. This includes concept to drop the network identity off the network itself, or use new ID, not just managing announces to buddy list entries.
Interesting! I opened an issue [0] to discuss this feature (copied your post there). It might take a while to work on that as we have other tasks with a higher priority, but I intend to get back to it at some point.
Thanks, -Felipe