On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Jacob Appelbaum jacob@appelbaum.net wrote:
On 06/18/2012 11:26 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
This list of open Tor proposals is based on one I sent out in May of last year. Since I'd like to do this more regularly, I have added to each description the date when I wrote it. Most of the summaries from older proposals are unchanged since last May; the later ones in the list for 6/2012 I wrote pretty quickly since I want to get out the door tonight for an appointment, but I want to send this list out without further delay.
Perhaps this would make for a nice weekly cronjob? :)
Say rather, a regular task for me to do around the middle of the month. I don't expect movement to be so fast that much changes each week
OPEN, DRAFT, AND ACCEPTED PROPOSALS:
117 IPv6 exits
IPv6 is still the future, but now it's the kind of future that's unevenly distributed. It's time to do this one so that IPv6 traffic can be sent over Tor.
It needs updating to work properly with microdescriptors; it also has some open questions about DNS. (6/2012)
I'm a little unclear on the issue of DNS with regard to v6. I feel like we're having lots of DNS blocking issues. What specifically is the issue? Is Linus hacking on this?
Mostly concerning which address to connect to when a user says "BEGIN www.example.com", and which to report to the user, under what circumstances. The proposal, though kind of old and funky, *does* explain this.
[....]
psychoed? :-)
Whee spellcheck.