Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

David Goulet dgoulet@ev0ke.net writes:

Indeed.

I'm unsure between "512 Syntax error in command argument"

"552 Unrecognized entity"
    [A configuration key, a stream ID, circuit ID, event,
     mentioned in the command did not actually exist.]

But overall yes!

It looks like the previous code would have done a 512 (when ADD_ONION existed but didn't support authentication yet) so that's probably good here too.

...but, maybe "513 Unrecognized command argument" would be a good candidate, too?

...or even a new one for this case (and future cases) of "recognized, but not yet supported". "560 Not yet implemented" or similar?