Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:26 PM, George Kadianakis desnacked@riseup.net wrote:
I started writing a skeleton and some strings for the new website. I'm also attaching an image of how the website looked like in my head while I was writing the strings (although the person who codes, should choose the interface). Sathya (cc'ed) said that he would be interested in coding the web part.
Here are the .htmls - https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/index.html https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/captcha.html https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/bridges.html
Some links are sub-optimal in these mockups. Having link on "here", "these" or "this" is not really helpful. See http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/noClickHere and http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www/click.html for more details.
I think it would be better to have these links phrased as:
* I want [obfs2 bridges] for tor-obfsproxy-browser. * I want [obfs2 bridges] or [obfs3 bridges] for tor-flashproxy-pyobfsproxy. * I want [direct bridges] for other bundles like tor-browser. * This website allows you to get [bridge addresses]. * Please read the [introduction to obfuscated bridges and pluggable transports].
The square brackets delimit the linked part. I've replaced "direct bridges" because I think "direct" is probably a better wording than "normal". The norm might shift to obfsproxy bridges in the next months…
What do you think?