Hi Brandon,
There's a bunch of feedback in this thread.
Some of it involves relatively minor spec updates or clarifications. Other parts involve solving complex issues, and might belong in another spec (or a future version of the PT spec).
Can you let us know which feedback will make it into PT 2.0?
Thanks
Tim
On 21 Jun 2017, at 23:00, teor teor2345@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 Jun 2017, at 16:20, Yawning Angel yawning@schwanenlied.me wrote:
The "2.0" spec still doesn't have any provisions for using AF_LOCAL instead of the loopback interface, go figure. It's not as if I bring it up every time this topic comes up or anything right?
Th exact types of addr and port are not specified, so application could pass: unix:/var/run/tor/obfsocket And still remain within the spec.
But to make this usage clear, I suggest we change: addr:port To: <addr>[:<port>] And define addr as either an IPv4, IPv6, hostname, file path, or some other address understood by the application / proxy.
If we don't want to do that, please at least change it to: <addr>:<port>
T
-- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------