*Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. In this afternoon of China Time, I found a obfs4 bridge which is usable in China. The speed of Tor Browser connecting with obfs4 bridge, and the speed of Tor Browser connecting with Meek Azure, which is faster? It is more difficult for China's firewall to block I2P. If Tor can learn some strong points of I2P in future, Tor can work better in China. Thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. All the best with your work. Good luck in all that you will achieve.*
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:05:49AM +0800, Li Xiaodong wrote:
Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. In this afternoon of China Time, I found a obfs4 bridge which is usable in China. The speed of Tor Browser connecting with obfs4 bridge, and the speed of Tor Browser connecting with Meek Azure, which is faster? It is more difficult for China's firewall to block I2P. If Tor can learn some strong points of I2P in future, Tor can work better in China. Thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. All the best with your work. Good luck in all that you will achieve.
Most likely, obfs4 will be faster than meek-azure. Especially after tomorrow, when I will slow down meek-azure to reduce costs. See: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-September/009533.html
If you know some details of how I2P resists blocking, please add them to this wiki page: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/PluggableTransports To edit the wiki you can create an account: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/register Or use the shared cypherpunks/writecode account.
-
David Fifield -
Li Xiaodong