Notes for February 9 2017 meeting:
Kate:
1) Coordinating OONI media for ooniprobe phone app release
2) Talking to reporters about uptick in Tor use and downloads
3) Social media
Isabela:
1) MOSS #2 invoice/report out - finishing reports for sponsor4
2) Comms Dir interviews - jitsi + irc
3) Working with Linda on user test of Orfox Security Slider - Linda is
working with Elio on making sure we have imgs+logos files resources,
which eventually can be used by anyone who needs them, but we will apply
it at first on our website to bring it in parity with our style
guidelines (not change design just make sure we have one type of onion
image on the site not 5) - She is also doing a great job on recruiting
volunteers to our UX team! She has a list with 4 or 5 different folks
who are already with a task and helping out o/
4) Hiro is working with Metrics team as well as installing schleuder
(for using trac via email) - we are planning on hosting an open meeting
next week to discuss features for the script she created where you can
query trac tickets and do stuff - we are looking at network team wish
list as inspiration, just need to triage things a little and define
better the 'feature requests'
5) working on sponsorS final report
Mike:
1) Working on Sponsor2 traffic analysis resistance. I have most of the
system written how I want it; now comes testing.
2) We have a blog URL to test, but Kevin is still slowly fixing
remaining issues. I found a few myself and asked him about them. I
should just send the URL around to see if others have more.
Alison:
1) I'm going to put the social contract up to a formal vote sometime
next week (since atagar doesn't want anything grandfathered in.
2) After that, will get back on the membership docs.
3) Phoul and I will meet with Linda next week to discuss the support
portal design.
4) Global South outreach continues apace. One of our trainers had a
successful workshop in Karachi, and now we're planning the next one with
another trainer in Nairobi. Once we've had a few go well, I will write a
blog post.
5) I'm reviewing the Tor Meeting agenda feedback emails this weekend.
Georg:
1) We made progress on our Sponsor4 items
Arturo:
1) Launched ooniprobe mobile app, yay! See:
https://ooni.torproject.org/post/ooni-mobile-app/
2) Made a release candidate for the new ooniprobe web UI. See a live
demo of it here: http://demo.probe.ooni.io/
Nick:
1) Wrapping things up with 0.3.0
2) Stabilizing older release series again
3) Trying to finish core-dev hire.
Notes for February 2 2017 meeting:
Georg:
1) We concentrated our work on Sponsor4 items and on fixing regressions
in Tor Browser 6.5
2) Where are we with our applications team? <- we'll discuss things
further in Amsterdam + plan to have a meeting there
3) Helped a bit with the Tor Browser related Metrics blog post
Nick:
1) Hiring still going on. Lessons learned.
2) I'm going to be semi-afk 2/20 through 2/24. Email will be fine.
3) I think this is the week where we fix the remaining open 030 issues.
Another alpha next week probably. Then Sponsor4 prelim work, piles of
design proposals, and stable backports?
4) ahf-onboarding seems to be going okay so far (day 2).
Shari:
1) Interviewing candidates for Communications Director position.
2) Working on Tor meeting details.
3) Approaching funders.
4) Catching up on stuff from being out of the office last week.
Kate:
1) Answering press queries, posting on social media, will be working
with OONI on press push next week.
Mike:
1) Kevin ran into two issues with the blog that he is still resolving
(tag imports have issues, and there is a deployment issue). Sorry for
the false alarm last week :/.
2) Working on implementing Adaptive Padding generalization for tor-core
(Sponsor2); coordinating with Matt Wright, Marc Juarez, and SecureDrop
folks.
Alison:
1) Collecting responses for the Tor meeting agenda until tomorrow. Will
send a summary to this group before next week's meeting. Continuing to
do other meeting planning stuff with Shari and Gunner.
2) Global South outreach: will write a blog post once we've got a few
trainings scheduled
3) LFP events upcoming: Pratt Institute, Drexel University, Sacred Heart
Church, Temple University
4) Working with Shari, Isa, and Erin on comms director interviews
Karsten:
1) Blogged about Tor Metrics' new graph on Tor Browser downloads and
updates: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-browser-numbers
2) Planning to add another graph on Tor Browser downloads by operating
system.
3) Put out a new Onionoo release and closed about a dozen Atlas tickets
towards making Atlas more user-friendly, scheduled blog post for end of
February when next Onionoo protocol version 4.0 gets released.
4) Preparing for in-person meeting in Berlin next Friday.
Arturo:
1) Fires related to ooni infrastructure all resolved. Data has been
reprocessed new database has been populated, by the end of today
ooni-explorer will roll-over to the new database and everything will be
back to normal.
2) The first stage of the re-engineered data processing pipeline is
finished. We are now able to generate "canned" reports that are
compressed and result in much reduced storage and faster re-processing
times.
3) The ooniprobe mobile release is on track. We expect to upload an app
for review by apple today or tomorrow.
4) Addressed all items in the feedback provided by Linda to the new
ooniprobe web UI. Live demo available here: http://37.218.242.109/
Isabela:
1) SponsorU stuff is all done and invoice is being processed
2) Sponsor5 Milestone 2 was finished and reported to sponsor
3) SponsorS final quarterly report will be submitted today
4) New DRL proposal - had the call, waiting for follow up steps
5) Need to work on: Task Force proposal - OKRs example - User Growth
Strategy update report - sponsor4 reports
6) Interviewing candidates for Comms Dir position
Hi folks,
After another round of irc crazy, we're moving forward with the plan of
bricking up the #nottor irc channel:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/meetings/2016WinterDevMee…
velope is going to do the actual bricking in the next few days, once
he's tied up some loose ends. (Maybe I'll be the one to run the actual
commands, so it's got my name on it and it's more clear what's going on.)
So, be on the lookout for more misbehavior than usual in the coming days.
If you want to help but you don't know how to, let one of us know on irc
and we'll try to help you help.
Also, if we wanted to do some of the other transitions on that page, like
more work on making the mailing lists better, now could be a good time. :)
--Roger
Hi everyone,
we just put a new graph on Tor Metrics called "Tor Browser downloads and
updates":
https://metrics.torproject.org/webstats-tb.html
This graph is the result of a joint effort of the metrics team (with a
lot of input on the underlying code from iwakeh) together with Sebastian
(who co-authored the original database schema and who operates the web
log sanitizer), gk and boklm (who analyze an earlier graph and provided
insights about Tor Browser internals), and others who discussed the
graph and earlier prototypes.
Please take a look at this graph, play a bit with the two inputs (start
and end date), and give us feedback by raising questions about the data
or giving answers to previously raised questions.
The goal would be to write a blog post about this graph together with an
early analysis.
Currently open questions are:
- gk asks on the ticket
(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21236#comment:11): "The
results still confuse me (like: We have 100,000 new downloads each day
but that does not show up in the update pings which basically stay the
same? We still have more than 120,000 update requests every day, even
after almost 6 weeks after the last release?). But that is probably
another story. :)"
- hellais asked at yesterday's Vegas meeting: "how many times does a
normal tor browser do an update ping every day?" which was answered by
mikeperry and gk with "twice" "and on every start". This is probably
something we should clarify in the graph description.
- yawning asks on the ticket
(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21236#comment:25):
"Does it matter that the Linux sandbox behavior is totally different
from everyone else, because it uses a different implementation to
download, update check, and update? I suspect the user base isn't that
big right now, but I'd hate to throw stats off..."
Note that we're mostly hoping for feedback on the data, not on the
presentation. We know that there's room for making the graph prettier
or for providing more inputs to customize it. But we already spent way
more time on this graph than we had planned, so we'd save any feedback
on the presentation (except for typos or trivial tweaks) for later in
the year.
Thanks!
All the best,
Karsten