tor-relays May 2016

tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

73 participants
55 discussions

https://itldc.com/
by Markus Koch 02 May '16

02 May '16

its fair to say they are fed up and dont want to have any Tor Exit Nodes anymore. Just revieved: Subject: Lots of abuse reports (ID 234162) -------------------------------------------------------- Hi, We receive abuse reports regarding your VDS from our colleagues. At least: 1) Registrations and ordering service from another companies for spam sending 2) Fraud 3) Malicious activity like scans and hacking. Some of these incidents already resolved, some still under investigation. I need to note that we unable to provide service to you. We expect normal usage of our services, but (as I see) this is not possible in your case. Your VDS's will be stopped within next few hours. I am less pissed on the ISP and much more pissed on the user ... Markus

3 3

Re: [tor-relays] https://itldc.com/
by Tristan 01 May '16

01 May '16

Like it says in the exit relay guide, some ISPs find it easier to give you the boot rather than deal with constant abuse complaints. On May 1, 2016 12:13 PM, "Markus Koch" <niftybunny(a)googlemail.com> wrote: This isp was exit friendly 2 weeks ago. It was posted around 3 weeks ago (look at up) in (this mailing list) and they were fine with it. Now they are not, just letting you guys know that they changed their minds. Sent from my iPad > On 01 May 2016, at 19:02, Xza <yandereson(a)riseup.net> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Did you ask them what they say about Tor exit nodes? > It's common that they don't want Exit nodes on their VPS services. > Should always ask ISPs beforehand and how they deal with abuse complains. > > >> On May 1, 2016 6:12:29 PM GMT+02:00, Markus Koch < niftybunny(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >> its fair to say they are fed up and dont want to have any Tor Exit >> Nodes anymore. Just revieved: >> >> Subject: Lots of abuse reports (ID 234162) >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> Hi, >> >> We receive abuse reports regarding your VDS from our colleagues. >> >> At least: >> >> 1) Registrations and ordering service from another companies for spam >> sending >> 2) Fraud >> 3) Malicious activity like scans and hacking. >> >> Some of these incidents already resolved, some still under >> investigation. >> >> I need to note that we unable to provide service to you. We expect >> normal usage of our services, but (as I see) this is not possible in >> your case. >> >> Your VDS's will be stopped within next few hours. >> >> I am less pissed on the ISP and much more pissed on the user ... >> >> Markus >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > - -- > PGP : 29A4CE52 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQI4BAEBCgAiGxxEbyA8eWFuZGVyZXNvbkByaXNldXAubmV0PgUCVyY2lAAKCRBI > of/XNyszSn31D/47zKuHHIkvNSPsMYUNL/Np7iVUBRdi2oBMnFuQrg12ZlgMAE7P > yRQPTFZbwznmlwQU/ZZjZXroiT4QNMPjShR/C7gTnyBVMROnZOfwGxcc5ASeXgcz > 7GexNZUI82rv+PkVg3OW5rrdR5g+I0U14lN2w4ewbGaunDkLiSP3GBoqoSc6WbAj > JoPUT03Hj920G8+QqRNiPyWGWMnCEEB08xv5wfOcBTvw72hFcvp8hLiE/yXM1BRN > vB8RC18AGsj46H2h4yoqVdU+Y1gWxs/XrhtQw6zF8ERINnE2ErLjpCm3vcqKYIo6 > ZDXEWBGnt1xJJlpsPlDuh1ix0KfwIrW6ODD5ON6cv7wpmOuxaELSJrcOClw7a8ND > NltKvuyuMMTj6pwJDbTGz6HliyGhq7CkWzbCORs7DPxYURxzUzpnHC8U5111xjNH > LzI7L4S8TTD8+U+Q69d/5FKuVBrsfmK2JcuOLZ8QqE3c2jTjw6mUhSMfkHkXAlpe > wtb6nbUJG20H35FkltHV5mdKS4qew1Yd7D7CsWNVZ1uIhJPdMqoAi82TO+zUvRj8 > N48jfhB89ihHFy3ja0cDQqa6rBR4iIS4UCWdKTLq9UJBxNznIkXwpqQMgkjDwiPs > MBVECM55in87wZ8V/QuuNe9euhawaUIJEuKORWAmdwbkigTJ4FurnrFMvw== > =nhzL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

2 1

Re: [tor-relays] "support team" address?
by eliaz 01 May '16

01 May '16

> On 4/30/2016 7:33:26 PM, Moritz Bartl (moritz(a)torservers.net) wrote: > > On 04/30/2016 04:51 PM, eliaz wrote: > > I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor > > unexpectedly exited.... Send a copy of Your Tor Log to the support > > team." So, what's the address? > > This is the list for relay operation, not Tor Browser questions. There > is currently no good list for support questions, but tor-talk is a > better "catch all" than tor-relays. [snip] I neglected to mention that tor crashes upon restart when I'm running my bridge. Restarting in client mode works fine. So should I send the details to tor-talk or tor-relays?

2 1

Slow bandwidth, bridge + obfsproxy project (+Socks for LAN?)
by Petrusko 01 May '16

01 May '16

Hey all, 1. Coming here to learn some quick lessons about bridges+obfsproxy. I'm thinking about that when I see some slow upload bandwidth speed like at home for example. Running a relay will be a bottleneck... so a bridge will be more useful... (less than 1Mbits/s upload :s ) 2. If computers running bridges are not 24/24 powered, will it be useful for people ? When I see the "lifecycle of a relay" article, I can understand a relay will be useful if it's always available, but what about a bridge ? (office hours for example) 3. Will this bridge+obfsproxy can be useful for the LAN computers, with Socks for example for LAN connections, to redirect traffic to Tor ? Those services can run together on the same instance ? ex on the doc: SocksPort 4000 #example for the LAN connection (default = 0) ORPort auto BridgeRelay 1 Exitpolicy reject *:* 4. I'm confused, the "bridge" is acting like a relay ? (like a router on a network, 50% upload / 50% download...?). Or like a hidden door to contact the Tor network, and the client will only use relays after without the bridge ? (I don't want this server to be a bottleneck...!) Many thx for your help and your thoughts about this little contribution! -- Petrusko PubKey EBE23AE5 C0BF 2184 4A77 4A18 90E9 F72C B3CA E665 EBE2 3AE5

2 2

Re: [tor-relays] "support team" address?
by eliaz 01 May '16

01 May '16

Thanks for the precise help, Roger. some relies interleaved: > On 4/30/2016 7:41:48 PM, Roger Dingledine (arma(a)mit.edu) wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 02:51:27PM +0000, eliaz wrote: > > I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor > > unexpectedly exited.... Send a copy of Your Tor Log to the support > > team." So, what's the address? > > We have alas stopped operating the support team, since we didn't have > funding to keep it going, and it was being overwhelmed by users who wanted > the same things over and over. We've instead been focusing on cleaning > up our documentation, improving user experience, etc in hopes that in > the future we'll have fewer users who think contacting the support desk > is the right first move. > > I've opened https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18939 > so we can confuse fewer users with that phrase. Aha, that must be why previous requests to rt.torproject.org went unanswered? Water over the dam... > In your case, my guess is that you added something to your torrc file, > which caused your Tor to fail when it restarted it. Tor Browser isn't > really meant to be used along with the phrase "when restarting Tor", > so I'm afraid you are in expert territory. :) Of course. I'd think it would be useful to know how if possible to do this for those who run torbrowser only on windows. > > Also, Tor Browser isn't a relay by default, and it's a poor way to operate > a relay. Who would know? It's nowhere stated in the documentation... > You'll do much better with a Tor package like the debian package: > https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-relay-debian I'm running debian already as a VM, & running tails off a usb stick so I can know how to help those who need that. The 24/7 low-power rig on which I currently run bridges runs on an old Intel Atom D2550 processor which doesn't accept graphical UI linux & I haven't gotten around to looking into command-line versions. If anyone can suggest one I'd appreciate it. >And lastly, > https://www.torproject.org/about/contact#support > has some suggestions for how to find help. Did that, also will follow Moritz's suggestions re IRC & stackexchange. Really, running bridges intelligently & learning what's going on is not straightforward at all. I keep at it out of perversity. - eliaz

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

tor-relays May 2016