Yes, but are all guard and bridge relays configured like this?
Maybe this should be a requirement for running a guard or bridge relay for this reason.
What does everyone think?
From: Matthew Glennon Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 5:18 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Prepping bridges for censorship
This is the reasoning I go with for using 443/80.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:11 AM Martin Kepplinger martink@posteo.de wrote: Am 21.06.2018 21:48 schrieb Keifer Bly:
Hi,
So I had a thought. It seems like a lot of the relays run off of various port numbers (of course). However if all of the relays and bridges are running off of various port numbers (ie 9001, 10000, etc.), couldn’t this stop censored users (who’s isp or local firewall only allows certain ports like 80 and 443) from being able to connect to the tor network even when using bridges due to the port that the bridge of guard relay being run on a port number that is blocked by the isp or local firewall?
Just a thought.
Sure, just like for guard relays, for bridges it makes sense to configure ORPort to be 443 or 80, to be reachable from behind messy firewalls.
martin
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays