On 1/17/2014 9:24 PM, nano wrote:
On 18/01/2014 12:30 PM, eliaz wrote:
On 1/15/2014 8:19 AM, nano wrote:
On 15/01/2014 10:29 PM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
[...]
I've been thinking for a while that a separate list for *bridge* operators might be a good idea.
[snip]
If other bridge operators also feel underserved and experienced usersfeel beleaguered by us, maybe opening a list for bridge operators (or an encrypted support address) might be a good experiment. Even if a dedicated list is populated only amateurs it might help us keep running more consistently & intelligently. Yup, my bridge is down for now. Understanding what I'm doing has taken too much time away from other work. I hope to have the bridge up again>> as soon as I have enough time to work things out on my own or frame intelligent questions. - eliaz ---- gpg 04DEF82B
I don't see any reason why bridge related topics shouldn't be posted to [tor-relays]; they are, after all, a relay.
[snip]>
I'd like to help you with your bridge problems; however, I don't run relays in graphical environments and don't use Vidalia. Have you considered launching a Tor cloud instance to run a bridge [*]? It is free (for 12 months on Amazon), simple to setup, and requires very little (if any) maintenance. If you decide you would like to run a bridge on Amazon and have any difficulties, I would be happy to help. You can email me off list if you prefer.
I appreciate the offers, but until I catch up on my day job I won't be able to take much advantage of them, and my delays in responding will annoy both of us. And I want to first check out why switching between tor versions in windows hasn't been working before asking questions relevant to tor itself. I hope to be back soon. - eliaz
--- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com