On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
What constitutes a minimal useful exit policy? Mine is curently
reject 0.0.0.0/8:* reject 169.254.0.0/16:* reject 127.0.0.0/8:* reject 192.168.0.0/16:* reject 10.0.0.0/8:* reject 172.16.0.0/12:* reject 78.46.119.2:* accept *:22 accept *:443 accept *:465 accept *:563 accept *:992-995 reject *:*
which doesn't give me any complaints, but also no exit flag. On the other hand I would love to unthrottle it (this is a dual-core Atom, but on 1 GBit line) as long as someone pays for the extra traffic (this is 6.9 EUR/TByte).
6.9 EUR * 30 TB is quite pricy. At the current plan, we could pay for part of it, but we'd hope you, or the community around you, can pay for the other part.
I think there are several people in my position. So
a) what minimal exit policy would qualify us for applying for funding?
accept *:80 accept *:443 accept *:554 accept *:1755
That also happens to be enough to get you the Exit flag.
b) when and who is the contact? Should I just talk to Zwiebelfreunde e.V.?
The contact for what? I've been coordinating potential exit relay operators so far. Once things are up and running a bit more, I'm hoping Tor can contract part-time to somebody and I'll hand everything to him/her to keep it all going.
--Roger