Sounds like CloudFlare's threat policy.
Always watching my ass to be a good old Tor operator, I got my nodes on
the list. Always fun to see how one time not updating all your
MyFamily's gets you marked for life xD
Time for some conf-updating.
On 27/09/16 19:37, nusenu wrote:
> pa011@web.de wrote:
>> there is that list of "potentially_dangerous_relaygroups" you published.
>> Could yo please emphasize a bit more on what brings a relay on that list, apart from incorrect given MyFamily which doesnt seem to be always the case.
>> I mean I see quite a few well respected names on that list ?
>
>
> to quote from https://github.com/ornetstats/stats
> (1) "dangerous" in the sense that a tor client might has a chance to
> use more than one of these relays in a single circuit
> (2) these relays are aggregated based on contact information
> (3) if their groupsize is bigger than their effective family size
> and they are operated in more than one /16 network block they are listed
> (4) this list might contain false-positives (contact information is
> not authenticated)
>
> Does that answer your question?
>
> I probably should also filter entries where two out of guard_prob,
> middle_prob and exit_prob are 0 since that means that (1) is never the
> case - iff onionoo is right about these probabilities.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor- relays
>
--
Tim Semeijn
Babylon Network
PGP: 0x2A540FA5 / 3DF3 13FA 4B60 E48A E755 9663 B187 0310 2A54 0FA5
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor- relays