Am 27.09.2016 um 19:37 schrieb nusenu:
pa011@web.de wrote:
there is that list of "potentially_dangerous_relaygroups" you published. Could yo please emphasize a bit more on what brings a relay on that list, apart from incorrect given MyFamily which doesnt seem to be always the case. I mean I see quite a few well respected names on that list ?
to quote from https://github.com/ornetstats/stats (1) "dangerous" in the sense that a tor client might has a chance to use more than one of these relays in a single circuit (2) these relays are aggregated based on contact information (3) if their groupsize is bigger than their effective family size and they are operated in more than one /16 network block they are listed (4) this list might contain false-positives (contact information is not authenticated)
Does that answer your question?
I probably should also filter entries where two out of guard_prob, middle_prob and exit_prob are 0 since that means that (1) is never the case - iff onionoo is right about these probabilities.
nusenu,
great respect of your work at first and thank you for the answer provided as well.
It - plus the follow up from that many contributors - did answer my questions apart from two left:
- should only Markus be contacted instead of lets say at least all the folks with more than 2 notes to make them aware? - how could it take nearly a week for that serious discussion to start?
I tend to agree with what has been written "I am in favour of a scheme where the process of joining a family is authenticated." Personally I will correct my entries soon to get me off that list :-)