Roger Dingledine arma@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:05:43AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I think you will find this is not an uncommon configuration among high-bandwidth relays.
I will check further into the procedure for which Roger posted a URLto see whether it will indeed give me a list of such addresses that I can use. If so, I will certainly begin running it, scraping the addresses, and merging them with the addresses already going into table creation.
It will not do what you want. It is only for exit addresses.
Yes, I saw that after I took a look. However, that shouldn't really be a problem because the Exit addresses are the ones that could have gotten into the block list simply by doing their job. A non-Exit on the block list got their by its operator's own bad behavior. If someone writes to me and promises never to do it again, I'll remove his address from the block list, but on the condition the promise is kept. Likewise if someone writes to me and says his relay used to run as an Exit, but now just runs as entry/middle, I'll also remove his address, again conditionally, because his address may have gotten into the block list when it was an Exit doing its job. Again, the published address would still get a pass anytime it appears in a consensus.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************