-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/15 06:03, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
On 21 Jan 2015, at 05:10, eric gisse jowr.pi@gmail.com wrote:
Holy crap, 40%? And that's been historically acceptable?
I don't think it was historically like that.
Actually, it's not that bad:
https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/bwauths-2015-01-21.png
That graph shows that most relays have been measured by either 4 or 5 bandwidth authorities in the past weeks. Only relays with 0, 1, or 2 measurements had their consensus weight fraction set to almost 0. But it's far less than 40% of relays. I assume that's natural churn in the network.
Seems like the two relays mentioned on this list have some other issue. Ideas, anyone?
All the best, Karsten