Will try to change Address to IP instead of hostname.
Cool, did not know about the HardwareAccel, enabling it now.

Nope, SSL is patched and not vurnable to heartbleed

Regards,
Markus



From: zwiebel@quantentunnel.de
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:02:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic

torrc looks good in my eyes.
 
I dont use 'Address'. Did you try the IP 'Address 193.11.113.99' ?
 
For a higher speed (which we dont talk about today) you can use 'HardwareAccel 1'
 
I suppose SSL is not bleeding?
 
Felix (clueless)
 
Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2014 um 14:26 Uhr
Von: "Markus Klock" <markus_klock@hotmail.com>
An: "tor-relays@lists.torproject.org" <tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic
I uploaded my current torrc here:
http://pastebin.com/iJjawwf6

any help tuning it is appreciated!

Regards,
Markus
 

From: markus_klock@hotmail.com
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:35:05 +0200
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] relay not receiving very much traffic

> > It looks like your node is running as guard. This usually drops your traffic for a while before it builds up again.
>
> Tim is referring to the phenomenon described here:
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay

Yeah I read it and figured that enough time have passed and I should start to see more traffic.

> So yes, this is a mystery. I wonder if you have a 1gbit connection to
> some parts of the Internet but not most of them?
This sounds a little far-fetched don't you think?
We have multiple links to our upstream, non of them congested and our upstream have good peering with a lot of big networks in both europe and US.
I really don think this network congestion is the issue here...
 
> What are the differences between your old torrc and your new one?

Sadly I don't have my old torrc, last time was over 2 years ago and the server I used is gone now.

I did however apply all the changes I found here:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2010-August/000164.html

but after reading more I figured maybe some of the sysctl-commands did more damage than good...
could this be part of the problem maybe?

Regards,
Markus

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
 
 

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays