I am forced to peer with both Cogent and HE because of this.
On Jan 23, 2017, at 22:28, niftybunny <abuse@to-surf-and-protect.netmailto:abuse@to-surf-and-protect.net> wrote:
BGP should choose another path? BGP Routing is highly "political" but IPs just black holed is really really bad ... If this is true: WTF?!
niftybunny abuse@to-surf-and-protect.netmailto:abuse@to-surf-and-protect.net
On 24 Jan 2017, at 05:24, teor <teor2345@gmail.commailto:teor2345@gmail.com> wrote:
On 24 Jan 2017, at 15:18, niftybunny <abuse@to-surf-and-protect.netmailto:abuse@to-surf-and-protect.net> wrote:
Could I get an ELI5 for this please?
If you want an ELI5, explain your request like I'm five years old.
On 24 Jan 2017, at 04:40, John Ricketts <john@quintex.commailto:john@quintex.com> wrote:
It is entirely possible this is a result of the HE vs Cogent feud, big break in the IPv6 routing tables as a cogent is refusing to peer with HE. Not sure where they are in that negotiation...
When two big internet companies don't agree on who pays when they swap packets, they punish their users by refusing to swap packets with each other.
T
-- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgmailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgmailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays