My dropping consensus overlaps exactly with the blue line on that graph time-wise. The 1 Month Graph shows this pretty well.
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3D7E274A87D9A89AF064C13D1EE4CA1F184F26...
It feels as if I am almost completely dependent on that blue node, although since one needs multiple measures, it shouldn't be possible.
On 21.01.2015 11:34 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/15 06:03, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
On 21 Jan 2015, at 05:10, eric gisse jowr.pi@gmail.com wrote:
Holy crap, 40%? And that's been historically acceptable?
I don't think it was historically like that.
Actually, it's not that bad:
https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/bwauths-2015-01-21.png
That graph shows that most relays have been measured by either 4 or 5 bandwidth authorities in the past weeks. Only relays with 0, 1, or 2 measurements had their consensus weight fraction set to almost 0. But it's far less than 40% of relays. I assume that's natural churn in the network.
Seems like the two relays mentioned on this list have some other issue. Ideas, anyone?
All the best, Karsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUv4C4AAoJEJd5OEYhk8hICKYH/21kTHfZ0pG0L/OiFBrbTFy3 bNAPYeTa1AAJb0PHpweKn7gX9pBheKwCDzd36Nk8cWhkYJ/QmrumE2IXxoFTGT3L X++MCTxqtnN+XDqNlNdgyAfYVAk/jG7RtqxSzxDFTl3BSW18t8KwbOGokuWluAI+ Zp7Oo33Rmvk3/Jmgc4Ht364esrLXyFpO2SBdGCzSLLtSkPATIMrnhBx5ruDpWGcg 4wD5tNzztfBfrc7vSVwJXLTfAmJOZmaH7nBRS8CRhOlQ9x6/FBW8unSf8bD75+O7 mMep1/k2QJlTwbU9ydySgx4crwO1b5bLKOoD8kYme3TDM6qjZ5cpcETpiR01vUM= =CefK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays