Dear colleagues,
Im a bit confused about the "named" flag. My relay is running smooth and i already received the "guard" flag but still no named flag. I also read the directory specification paper. I dont have the unnamed status nor is there another server with that name in use. Im not sure if the authority supports name binding but from what i understand the authority should support it.
Maybe someone on this list is able to look into that matter ...
Router Name: ParEpistemenTaksis Fingerprint: 3C82 285F AC21 71FA 5178 340A 82B0 5F21 90AB 68E9 -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebsstian Urbach
----------------------------------- Religion is a symptom of irrational belief and groundless hope. ----------------------------------- Gregory House, M.D.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:45:33 +0100 Sebastian Urbach sebastian@urbach.org wrote:
nor is there another server with that name in use.
And you are certain there wasn't one for the past 6 months?
Hi,
Not really, is there a way to lookup the name for that time frame ? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebsstian Urbach
----------------------------------- Religion is a symptom of irrational belief and groundless hope. ----------------------------------- Gregory House, M.D.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:45:33 +0100 Sebastian Urbach sebastian@urbach.org wrote:
nor is there another server with that name in use.
And you are certain there wasn't one for the past 6 months?
On Nov 28, 2013, at 22:45 , Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Im a bit confused about the "named" flag. My relay is running smooth and i already received the "guard" flag but still no named flag. I also read the directory specification paper. I dont have the unnamed status nor is there another server with that name in use. Im not sure if the authority supports name binding but from what i understand the authority should support it.
Maybe someone on this list is able to look into that matter ...
This is from the dir spec:
Newer Naming authorities run a script that registers routers in their mapping files once the routers have been online at least two weeks, no other router has that nickname, and no other router has wanted the nickname for a month. If a router has not been online for six months, the router is removed.
Atlas first sees you on November 21, less than two weeks ago. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3C82285FAC2171FA5178340A82B05F2190AB68...
Hi,
Thanks, must have slipped my mind ... -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebsstian Urbach
----------------------------------- Religion is a symptom of irrational belief and groundless hope. ----------------------------------- Gregory House, M.D.
On Nov 28, 2013, at 22:45 , Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Dear colleagues, Im a bit confused about the "named" flag. My relay is running smooth and i already received the "guard" flag but still no named flag. I also read the directory specification paper. I dont have the unnamed status nor is there another server with that name in use. Im not sure if the authority supports name binding but from what i understand the authority should support it. Maybe someone on this list is able to look into that matter ...
This is from the dir spec:
Newer Naming authorities run a script that registers routers in their mapping files once the routers have been online at least two weeks, no other router has that nickname, and no other router has wanted the nickname for a month. If a router has not been online for six months, the router is removed.
Atlas first sees you on November 21, less than two weeks ago. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3C82285FAC2171FA5178340A82B05F2190AB68...
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
-
Jobiwan Kenobi -
Roman Mamedov -
Sebastian Urbach