Hi all,
So I am looking to add some reachable ports to my OBFS4 bridge at https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/148BD64BED9F2C27637D986DE032E CF14E5B9E9A
As this list is public, I guess I should not provide the port numbers that tor and obfs4 are running on. However, would adding reachable ports like 80, 443, 8080 be doable?
I know that these ports that might not bind very well as lots of other types of traffic use them, however I saw the ticket at
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7875
And this raises a concern about bridges being reachable for users who are connecting from behind firewalls, etc (hence the reason why they need to use a bridge), it seems like a good idea to have bridges reachable on ports that aren't likely to be blocked by network administrators or ISPS.
Let me know what you think.
--Keifer
On 2/22/19 12:11 AM, Keifer Bly wrote:
As this list is public, I guess I should not provide the port numbers that tor and obfs4 are running on.
The IP is much more important to be kept hidden.
However, would adding reachable ports like 80, 443, 8080 be doable?
Sure, do it!
Thanks, what would I add to torrc to have the bridge reachable on more than one port at once? Could I do that without restarting the bridge? Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:20 AM Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de wrote:
On 2/22/19 12:11 AM, Keifer Bly wrote:
As this list is public, I guess I should not provide the port numbers that tor and obfs4 are running on.
The IP is much more important to be kept hidden.
However, would adding reachable ports like 80, 443, 8080 be doable?
Sure, do it!
-- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org