The guard status of the relay here is hanging on by a thread (consensus 5-in-favor 4-against) and this had me wondering until I read
[tor-relays] don't worry (to much) if your relay is loosing the guard flag
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2014-July/005043.html
Looking at the Consensus Health page it's clear that about 1000 other relays are also separated from Guard Oblivion by a single vote.
I'm curious if anyone knows roughly when the next authority will upgrade to a version with the new criteria and the little guards get the chop.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
its done
https://metrics.torproject.org/network.html#relayflags
20.08.2014, 19:23 Nusenu:
its done
and by the looks of it, it didn't have much impact on the bandwidth
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bwhist-flags
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bandwidth-flags
-- bastik
I wonder why there is a sudden decrease in number of Guard nodes?
-kali-
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 5:40 PM, "Sebastian G. <bastik.tor>" bastik.tor@googlemail.com wrote:
20.08.2014, 19:23 Nusenu: its done
and by the looks of it, it didn't have much impact on the bandwidth
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bwhist-flags
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bandwidth-flags
-- bastik
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Kali Tor kalitor42@yahoo.com writes:
I wonder why there is a sudden decrease in number of Guard nodes?
-kali-
Because of the guard security changes that are currently being conducted, and specifically this section of proposal 236: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/38e1ccdecac69be6651fc6d0ffb0b...
Please read this paper for more information: https://www.petsymposium.org/2014/papers/Dingledine.pdf
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 5:40 PM, "Sebastian G. <bastik.tor>" bastik.tor@googlemail.com wrote:
20.08.2014, 19:23 Nusenu: its done
and by the looks of it, it didn't have much impact on the bandwidth
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bwhist-flags
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bandwidth-flags
Yes, it seems so. You can read some analysis on this here: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-March/006458.html
Thanks. At least it is good to see the graph stabilizing a bit after the sudden drop.
-kali-
On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:31 PM, George Kadianakis desnacked@riseup.net wrote:
Kali Tor kalitor42@yahoo.com writes:
I wonder why there is a sudden decrease in number of Guard nodes?
-kali-
Because of the guard security changes that are currently being conducted, and specifically this section of proposal 236: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/38e1ccdecac69be6651fc6d0ffb0b...
Please read this paper for more information: https://www.petsymposium.org/2014/papers/Dingledine.pdf
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 5:40 PM, "Sebastian G.
<bastik.tor>" bastik.tor@googlemail.com wrote:
20.08.2014, 19:23 Nusenu: its done
and by the looks of it, it didn't have much impact on the bandwidth
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bwhist-flags
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bandwidth-flags
Yes, it seems so. You can read some analysis on this here: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-March/006458.html
tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
-
George Kadianakis -
Kali Tor -
Nusenu -
Sebastian G. <bastik.tor> -
starlight.2014q3＠binnacle.cx