While Jekyll is indeed a choice, for larger sites, it's generation time is simply too long. Development takes time on Jekyll, simply because of it's generation time. If we can offset that problem in some way, that would be great, otherwise I feel we should be looking at some other static site generator (Someone suggested Middleman? It also has internationalization!)
As for the debate about author's writing 'code', Markdown is easy to learn and use, and outputs semantic data. We really don't need a rich text editor of some sort, Markdown (Or similar languages) are good enough.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Gvido Glazers gvido.glazers@gmail.comwrote:
Hello, Everyone! Missed the introduction thread, so I'll just start with that: I'm Gvido, and I'm currently based in Amsterdam. My official job title is front-end developer, but in reality I do full-stack development with ruby or python.
Now, back on topic. I'm also going to agree with the general sentiment that Jekyll is the way to go. It's stable, simple, widely used, easy to extend, and powerful. Markdown is really easy to learn, I don't think content creators writing about Tor would have a problem grasping it.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, William Papper william@papper.me wrote:
Definitely a +1 for Jekyll. There's no need to reinvent the wheel. While a custom solution or plain HTML may seem appealing at first (and would be great for a personal project), Jekyll lets us move much quicker and keeps everything relatively standardized. It also makes it easier for people to collaborate, since Jekyll is widely used.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Moritz Süß moritz@moritzsuess.dewrote:
Markdown is _very_ simple. Please check out http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/basics and try out markdown at http://www.markdownviewer.com/.
Let’s try to use these as long as possible for getting people familiarized with Markdown. We do not want to duplicate existing documentation efforts, and keep up-front investment for tools as low as possible in this project.
I hope I am correct in my understanding that we agree on a static website generator now, and kind-off agree on Jekyll.
Best Moritz
Am 10.01.2014 um 17:35 schrieb Earl G globallogins@gmail.com:
Ok So Jeklly a user guide for people that need to learn markdown to be able to contribute to the blog.
and the front of the site user friendly for anybody that wants to get started.
back of the site and deeper for the linux nerds and specialists that want to dig deeper.
job done
On 10 January 2014 17:32, Sam E. Lawrence selbrit@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Sean Rafferty seanmrafferty@me.comwrote:
But there are a lot of content writers in the world that just don’t know it well enough.
Then they can learn. If someone wants to contribute to a solution to a problem as complex as privacy and security, then learning markdown / HTML should be a minor investment of their time. Basic HTML takes little time to learn, and will instantly boost the self-respect of anyone who wants to help Tor and other software projects. Setting a bar is worth it, IMO.
Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit: https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit: https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit: https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit: https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit: https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team