On Jan 16, 2012 2:38 PM, "Ian Goldberg" iang@cs.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:16:31PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg iang@cs.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
[...]
FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography jounral:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/nl86n0u547873001/
(The above cacr link has also been updated to the latest version.)
Congratulations, Ian! Any substantial changes since the CACR version?
No, just minor ones, and I don't think any involving the protocol itself, but just the text.
Have you been getting any feedback from other vectors? Any interesting/useful comments from reviewers?
Is it your sense that folks outside of PCs and this list are reviewing your work here and giving it the kind of attention we'd want before deploying it? And if not, is there anything we can do to help this design get more attention?
As far as I know, only the journal reviewers and this list (and we authors, of course) have looked at it. Not too surprising, of course, as Tor is probably the most obvious use case.
Most SSL connections involve only one authenticated side.
- Ian
tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev